Showing posts with label LEED. Show all posts
Showing posts with label LEED. Show all posts

Friday, February 24, 2012

Is there more than one cool roofing standard?

Some cool roofing standards programs like LEED and Green Globes are voluntary, but others like building codes in Atlanta, Chicago and throughout California mandate minimum standards that all buildings must meet.

It is extremely important for roofing contractors to understand national and local cool roofing standards. Here is a list of the major ones:
  • California Title 24 (the most stringent standards in the nation)
  • The Environmental Protection Agency's ENERGY STAR program
  • U.S. Green Building Council's LEED program
  • The Green Building Initiative's Green Globes program (similar to LEED)
  • American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE)
  • Local standards — Municipalities nationwide are identifying the benefits of using energy-saving building codes that go beyond the standard code language. Please check with your local government to determine standards in your particular region.

One of the reasons it is hard to be specific about codes is the lack of any unified standard - there is no national energy code. California is definitely leading the way and setting a good example for the rest, but each state has its own standards. One advantage of that is that each state can determine codes that make the most sense for their specific climate.


Find a Contractor here
 

ROOFING CONTRACTORS NEEDED IN MULTIPLE STATES!
Patton Services | (309) 303-3128 | rpatton55@comcast.net | http://www.whiteroofingsystems.com

Friday, September 30, 2011

Cool Roofs Also Beneficial in Cold Climates

One of the goals of the U.S. Department of Energy's Cool Roofs Roadmap is to answer one of the most fundamental cool roof-related questions: Are cool roofs beneficial in cold climates?

Andre O. Desjarlais and P. Marc LaFrance both say they think so - if not from strictly an energy standpoint, then from the fact that they can help reduce the urban heat island effect.

"If you put a cool roof on a building in a cold climate and run the calculator strictly on energy, it may not save energy because of the heating penalty," says LaFrance. "But if you take into account the urban heat island effect, the indirect benefits may make cool roofs worthwhile."

This is often a tough sell for facility managers only worried about their own bottom lines. But research has already shown the effectiveness of cool roofs like those from Conklin at reducing urban heat islands, pollution and smog. For instance, the Heat Island Group at LBNL showed that Los Angeles spends about $100 million in extra energy costs to mitigate its urban heat island.

Reducing the temperature citywide means less air conditioning energy is required everywhere, which also means fewer greenhouse gas emissions. For this reason, many northern cities like Chicago, Philadelphia and New York City, have mandated cool roofs in their building codes. Utilities in northern states like Wyoming, Minnesota and Oregon offer rebates for the use of cool roofs. And the voluntary LEED rating system specifies cool roofs for a point explicitly for "urban heat island reduction." LaFrance says he hopes the research planned in the Cool Roofs Roadmap will more firmly establish a link between widespread use of cool roofs and reduced air conditioning energy use, pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.

One specific initiative, on which the Department of Energy is already working in conjunction with two other organizations (the White Roofs Alliance and Local Governments for Sustainability), is called the 100 Cool Cities initiative. DOE hopes to engage 100 cities around the world to commit to widespread installation of reflective surfaces by 2020. New York City, Taipei and Athens were the first three cities to sign up.

Find a Contractor
 

CONTRACTORS NEEDED IN MULTIPLE STATES!
Patton Services | (309) 303-3128 | rpatton55@comcast.net | http://www.whiteroofingsystems.com

Tuesday, July 19, 2011

Push for Cool Roofs Runs from Rebates to Mandates

As you know, a dark roof can add significantly to a building’s cooling load. The interest in lighter, more reflective roofs has been around for more than a decade, and the products like those from Conklin are increasingly more varied and claim ever-greater levels of reflectiveness. Incentives from government agencies and local utilities have sprung up in a half-dozen Sunbelt states, and research is continuing to provide more insight.

Approximately $40 billion is spent annually in the United States for cooling commercial buildings — one-sixth of the electricity consumed nationwide! Research has verified that various roof products like those from Conklin have greatly reduced air conditioning loads in buildings, cutting energy bills up to 50 percent, and shaving air-conditioning peak usage by 10 to 15 percent.

For example, a strip mall and single-story flat-roof commercial buildings in Florida with metal roofs experienced a 25 percent cut in cooling loads; school buildings tested were in the 10 percent range, says Craig Muccio, an end-use evaluation coordinator at Florida Power and Light (FPL), which operates in the state with the largest amount of cooling degree days in the nation.

A range of variables contributes to the amount of savings, according to FPL’s research, Muccio says. Four of the key factors are the air-conditioning system’s efficiency, the age of the roof, the level of insulation, and the configuration and orientation of the buildings.

Pacific Gas and Electric Co. (PGE) has been closely monitoring ongoing research and other cool-roof programs at the California Energy Commission (CEC) and the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Livermore, Calif., a federal research center managed by the University of California, Berkeley. “Our objective recently has been to understand how well cool roofs work and under what conditions they save energy,”says Peter Turnbull, customer service program manager for the San Francisco utility.

In California, LBNL tested three cool-roof buildings in the state’s hot Central Valley region: two medical office buildings, measuring 30,000 and 50,000 square feet, and a large chain drug store outlet. The two medical buildings cut air conditioning loads by 18 and 13 percent, respectively, while the drug store’s load dropped by about 2 percent.

As part of a cool-roof initiative among a number of utilities in Southeastern states, FPL initiated some of the most concentrated roofing efforts. “We looked to see if there were technologies and applications that would help the overall load profiles for our customers,” says Jack Rows, an FPL energy efficiency manager. “Within Florida, we have been in it longer than any of the other utilities in the Southeast, so we’re a good baseline for looking at cool roofs.”

One of the assessments by LBNL estimates potential annual savings from cool roofs in about a dozen major metropolitan areas, and the locations in the Sunbelt, not surprisingly, offer the most potential savings, with Phoenix and Los Angeles leading the way; Dallas, Houston and Miami are next. Buildings in Philadelphia, Washington, D.C., and Chicago will see savings, but the potential is less than for their Sunbelt counterparts.

Ideal climates for potential cool-roof buildings are ones with long cooling and short heating seasons, but cool roofs can reduce energy costs in much of the country. Roofs with high thermal emittance — high ability to radiate heat — and high solar reflectance are said to be cooler in the sun. The same is true of low-emittance roofs with very high solar reflectance.

Rebates/Incentives
Incentives for cool roofs have appeared in some Sunbelt states. For example, CEC is currently offering rebates on cool roofing that generally run 15 cents per square foot. The rebates have been ongoing for two years and remain at least through 2003. The state is running out of money for the program, but regulatory action is expected to resolve the situation.

In Florida, FPL offers an incentive of 15 cents per square foot to commercial and residential customers for a good reflective roof with a long life that on average costs about $1 per square foot installed, FPL’s Muccio says. “We’re promoting cool roofs for any of our customers who are replacing part if not all of an existing roof.”

With FPL, any light-colored thermoplastic roof membrane or reflective roof coating is eligible for an incentive as long as the reflective measures are installed over the conditioned building space, meet the Energy Star standards and increase solar reflectance by a minimum of 73 percent.

FPL has a network of more than 1,000 certified installers eligible to do the roofing and other energy efficiency work under its Commercial/Industrial Building Envelope (CIBE) program. Incentives for customers come as part of CIBE “certificates,” which are given by the contractors to qualifying customers that are prescreened by the utility.

California Title 24
California’s stringent building code efficiency standards, Title 24, are currently being overhauled and upgraded. Cool roofing is cited in the standard in a small way, but under the current proposal it will become a much more important part of the code in 2005. Title 24 is mainly for new construction, although a reroofing section is planned.

Two key measures — solar reflectivity and thermal emittance — are included in the proposed Title 24 standards for nonresidential buildings. Now a compliance option, the cool-roof standards will become a prescriptive requirement for low-sloped roofs with a ratio of rise-to-run not exceeding 2:12. High-sloped and residential roofs would be exempt. Buildings covered by the new requirement are offices, retail stores, health care facilities, schools, universities and high-tech manufacturing facilities.

Title 24 specifies rules for certification and labeling of solar reflectance and thermal emittance roofing products, using third-party testing of these two measurements. That differs from Energy Star numbers, which are supplied by product manufacturers exclusively.

Energy Star
The Energy Star program provides information on roofing products. To be an Energy Star qualified product, the material needs to have an initial reflectivity of .65. The highest rated products are in the .85 range. Details are on the agency’s Web site, which includes 18 pages of products, including membranes and coatings that claim reflectivity measures ranging from a low of .70 to highs of .91 on a scale of 0 to 1.0; scientists say a score of 1.0 is impossible. More than 150 manufacturers are listed on the site.

Roof products that meet or exceed the .65 solar reflectance level, without compromising product quality and performance, qualify for the Energy Star label, according to officials at EPA. Through a voluntary agreement, manufacturers put the Energy Star label on packaging for qualifying roof products and use the label in promotions and advertising of the certified products.

Professionals recommend that facility managers check local utilities or other sources for third-party verifications of reflectivity claims.

National requirements under Energy Star aren’t as stringent as what is proposed in the upgraded California Title 24 requirements. For example, a low-slope cool roof can qualify under Energy Star with a reflectivity factor of .65, compared with .70 for California’s proposed new requirement. Steep-slope roofs can be as low as .25 for reflectance under Energy Star.

LEED Rating System
One other tool available to the building community is the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) rating system that has been developed by the decade-old U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) in Washington, D.C. LEED has no specific criteria for cool roofs, but the use of them in connection with various urban heat island mitigation measures can help a building meet LEED criteria.

“We have one credit in particular within our sustainable sites category that specifically addresses landscaping and exterior design to reduce heat island and gives credit to projects that use light-colored, high-albedo materials,” says Emily Turk, USGBC’s chief architect. “It also gives credit to projects that use Energy Star high reflectance roofing or green-vegetation roofs.”

“The difference between a highly reflective roof and a more conventional, or ‘dark’ roof, can be something like a surface temperature difference of 50 or 60 degrees,” says PGE’s Turnbull. “Ambient temperature might be 110 degrees in the summer in the Central Valley of California. The temperature of a conventional roof might be 180 degrees, and a surface temperature of a cool roof with high reflectivity might be 120 degrees. When you think of the Delta-T, if you want to keep the inside space at 75 degrees, there is a tremendous difference between a surface that is 180 degrees and one that is 120 degrees.

“A cool roof is going to be a little bit warmer than the ambient temperature, but not much,” he says. “There is no doubt it saves energy, and we think there is some pretty good evidence that you get better life of the roof when you’re not dealing with the real extreme temperatures. All things being equal, cool roofs can extend the roof’s life.”

Please also see the March 2003 facilitiesnet.com article by Richard Nemec titled "Push for Cool Roofs Runs from Rebates to Mandates"

Find a Contractor


 

ROOFING CONTRACTORS NEEDED IN MULTIPLE STATES!
Patton Services | (309) 303-3128 | rpatton55@comcast.net | http://www.whiteroofingsystems.com/ 



Friday, July 15, 2011

Metal Cool Roofing with Infrared-Reflective Paint Pigments

New infrared-reflective pigments are being incorporated into paints used on architectural metal roofing products to allow them to achieve higher reflectivity values, even in darker colors such as black and brown. This improved reflectivity (e.g., black changes from 0.07 with normal pigments to 0.32 with infrared-reflective pigments) can mean a much cooler surface temperature and thus greater energy savings for the building below, and allows facility executives to select a sustainable roof without having to sacrifice color choices and aesthetics.

To get the one point for Sustainable Sites Credit 7.2: Heat Island Effect, the U.S. Green Building Council’s Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) green building rating system specifies Energy Star requirements, adding a 0.9 emissivity standard. For steep-sloped roofs, those with a rise-to-run ratio of 3:12 or greater, a 0.25 initial solar reflectance is required. In most cases, coated metal roofs can easily surpass the reflectivity requirement, and in some cases, they can achieve the 0.9 emissivity. But more often, they can only achieve an emissivity of 0.85, thereby eliminating them from achieving the LEED point.

For low-sloped roofs, those below 3:12, and flat roofs, the LEED reflectivity requirement is raised to 0.65, and the 0.9 emissivity standard is the same.

The Cool Metal Roofing Coalition, an organization comprised of metal industry trade associations, is providing written commentary and data to USGBC requesting consideration for a reduction of the emissivity standard to around 0.7. The Coalition contends that in addition to metal roofing’s energy efficiency when the reflective pigments are incorporated into a system’s design, metal’s long term ability to retain its reflective properties and a low life-cycle cost justify reducing the standard. The 0.9 standard “restricts a building owner’s ability to apply a suitable, long-term roof,” says Greg Crawford, executive director of the Coalition. The emissivity standard of 0.9 “is somewhat arbitrary,” says Andre Desjarlais, program manager for the Building Envelope research program at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, a supporting member of the Coalition. The 0.9 standard “is not defensible, but neither is eliminating emissivity altogether. We’re searching for middle ground.”

Please also see the March 2004 facilitiesnet.com article by Greg Zimmerman titled "Do Cool Roofs Fit In Cool Climates?"



Find a contractor


ROOFING CONTRACTORS NEEDED IN MULTIPLE STATES! 
Patton Services | (309) 303-3128 | rpatton55@comcast.net | http://www.whiteroofingsystems.com/ 

Wednesday, July 6, 2011

Understanding Cool Roofing Standards

Although some cool roofing standards programs such as Green Globes and LEED may be voluntary, others like the building codes in Atlanta, Chicago and California mandate minimum standards that all buildings must meet.

It is important for roofing contractors to understand cool roofing standards, so here is a list of the major ones:


  • California’s Title 24 (the most stringent standards in the nation)
  • The Environmental Protection Agency's ENERGY STAR program
  • U.S. Green Building Council's LEED program
  • The Green Building Initiative's Green Globes program (similar to LEED)
  • American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE)
  • Local standards — Municipalities nationwide are identifying the benefits of using energy-saving building codes that go beyond the standard code language. Please check with your local government to determine the standards in your region.

One of the reasons it’s hard to be specific about codes is the lack of any unified standard - there is no national energy code. Each state has its own standards. California is definitely leading the way and setting a good example for the rest. The one advantage is that each state can determine codes that make the most sense for their specific climate.

Please also see the March 2009 facilitiesnet.com article by Loren Snyder titled "Cool Roof Standards".


Tired of labor problems and low profit margins? Make more $$ spraying coatings with Conklin Roofing Systems! Patton Services | (309) 303-3128 | rpatton55@comcast.net | http://www.whiteroofingsystems.com